Application Paths of Semantic Modeling in Financial Fraud Detection and Risk Identification

Authors

  • Victor P. Gauthier School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA Author
  • Daniel S. Wu Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA Author

Keywords:

Semantic Modeling, Financial Fraud Detection, Risk Identification, Knowledge Graph, Semantic Rules, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning

Abstract

Financial fraud and risk pose significant threats to economic stability and individual well-being. Traditional detection methods often struggle to keep pace with increasingly sophisticated fraudulent schemes. Semantic modeling, which focuses on understanding the meaning and relationships within data, offers a promising avenue for enhancing fraud detection and risk identification. This review paper explores the application paths of semantic modeling in this domain. We begin with a historical overview of fraud detection techniques, highlighting the limitations of traditional approaches. Subsequently, we delve into core themes, including knowledge graph-based fraud detection and semantic rule-based inference for risk assessment. We then compare and contrast different semantic modeling approaches, addressing key challenges such as data heterogeneity and scalability. Furthermore, we discuss future perspectives, focusing on the integration of semantic modeling with emerging technologies like explainable AI and federated learning. The review synthesizes findings from various studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of the current state and future directions of semantic modeling in financial fraud detection and risk identification. This review aims to guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging semantic modeling to build more robust and effective fraud detection systems. We explore current limitations and highlight opportunities for future research in this rapidly evolving field, ensuring advancements in both prevention and detection methodologies can keep pace with ever-evolving and dynamic threats.

References

1. C. Wu, J. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Liang, and R. Du, “Semantic sleuth: Identifying ponzi contracts via large language models,” in Proc. 39th IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Automated Software Engineering, 2024, pp. 582-593.

2. C. L. Cheong, “Research on AI Security Strategies and Practical Approaches for Risk Management”, Journal of Computer, Signal, and System Research, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 98–115, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.71222/17gqja14.

3. J. Gong, Y. Wang, W. Xu, and Y. Zhang, “A deep fusion framework for financial fraud detection and early warning based on large language models,” J. Computer Science and Software Applications, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 19-29, 2024.

4. M. An, Y. Gao, J. Li, X. Wang, and X. He, “FRAUDLLM: Zero-Shot Fraud Detection with Large Language Models,” in China Conference on Information Retrieval, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2025, pp. 76-89.

5. S. Yuan, “Conceptual Modeling and Semantic Relations in the Construction of Financial Knowledge Graphs”, Econ. Manag. Innov., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 64–70, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.71222/evj1tt66.

6. S. Goel and O. Uzuner, “Do sentiments matter in fraud detection? Estimating semantic orientation of annual reports,” Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 215-239, 2016.

7. J. L. Zhao, “Graph-based deep dive on AI startup revenue composition and venture capital network effect,” Economics and Management Innovation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2026

8. W. Liu, Z. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Research on financial fraud detection by integrating latent semantic features of annual report text with accounting indicators,” J. Accounting & Organizational Change, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 841-866, 2025.

9. C. Song, M. Liu, C. Dong, L. Zhang, and C. Fang, “Leveraging Large Language Models in Financial Statement Fraud Detection of Listed Companies,” in 2025 Thirteenth Int. Conf. Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD), 2025, pp. 389-394.

10. S. Bhatt and G. Garg, “NLP for Fraud Detection and Security in Financial Documents,” in Transformative Natural Language Processing: Bridging Ambiguity in Healthcare, Legal, and Financial Applications, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 131-155.

11. Y. Yu, Z. Wu, Y. Han, Y. Ding, and W. Wei, “Improving Financial Statement Fraud Detection: A Large Language Model Processing Approach,” ACM Transactions on Internet Technology.

12. J. Wang, “A Literature Review of Enterprise Strategic Management in the Context of Digital Transformation”, Economics and Management Innovation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–78, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.71222/5wmnnj82.

13. C. Wei and X. Qian, “Bridging the Semantic Gap: An Ensemble Learning Framework With Textual Topic‐Raw Financial Feature Fusion to Enhance Fraud Detection in Chinese Markets,” J. of Mathematics, vol. 2025, no. 1, 6643152, 2025.

14. Z. Erva Ergun and E. Sefer, “Financial Statement Fraud Detection via Large Language Models,” Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, vol. 32, no. 4, e70021, 2025.

15. S. Yuan, "Mechanisms of High-Frequency Financial Data on Market Microstructure," Modern Economics & Management Forum, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 569–572, 2025.

16. N. Neha and V. Prabhu, “Language Models in Financial Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study,” in Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence on Textile and Apparel, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 45-60.

17. C. L. Cheong, “Study on Risk Assessment Methods and Multi-Dimensional Control Mechanisms in AI Systems”, European Journal of AI, Computing & Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–46, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.71222/58dr7v22.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Application Paths of Semantic Modeling in Financial Fraud Detection and Risk Identification. (2026). Journal of Technology, Culture & Sustainability, 2(1), 28-36. https://westminstersp.com/index.php/JTCS/article/view/21